![]() |
Environmental Health Network |
EHN P.O. Box 1155 Larkspur, California, 94977 - 1155 Support and Information Line (SAIL) 415.541.5075 |
QuickClicks to Index of Topics Covered
Or slowly scroll through, reading and learning as you go.
|
To Employers and Employees. Everywhere . . . While my sympathy is admittedly for the worker being forced from employment by unnecessary pollutants such as fragrances and pesticides (which are also scented so folks don't complain about the odor of pesticides), astute management can learn much from the following information. Petrochemical-derived fragrances do not "freshen" the air, nor do they "clean." Fragrances pollute the air, bodies of users and nonusers, and the water downstream where fish and wildlife can then be affected. When your employee requests fragrance-free accommodation, please look into the pollution generated by modern, petrochemical-derived fragrances. IF you are trying to "go Green" they shouldn't be used in the first place.
"Further questioning of individuals with a hypersensitivity indicated that 13.5%
(1.8% of the entire sample) reported losing their jobs because of their hypersensitivity." Quote from: A review of a two-phase population study of multiple chemical sensitivities Environmental Health Perspectives, Sept, 2003 by Stanley M. Caress, Anne C. Steinemann I fervently hope the information on this page helps workers, students, patients and others who are still fighting for their right to breathe air unpolluted by perfumes and other synthetically scented products. And I hope it helps management learn that there is a better way than allowing pollutants to ruin the health of even one more individual employee or visitor to that particular workplace, be it a hospital, a school, an office, what-have-you. These unnecessary fragrance pollutants include the wide variety of personal care products for men, women and children, as well as products such as cleaners, pesticides, fabric softeners and air "fresheners." Petrochemical-derived fragrances are ubiquitous, but there are safer alternative products readily available. I hope the information below will serve Human Resources officers trying to learn more about fragrance sensitization and how to accommodate the person with it. While you feel you are accommodating only one individual now, you may well be sparing the health of untold others down the road . . . and saving your organization many dollars spent on staff's downtime as they take sickleave. Common reactions to fragrance chemicals include cold- or flu-like symptoms, asthma, sinusitis, headaches (including migraines), as well as lost thoughts and mobility problems, which adversely affect production. Who needs neurotoxins in the workplace? Also, by determining that your organization will be free of petrochemical-derived fragrances, you all will be doing something to not only improve your indoor air, but also to help lessen the effects upon global warming. Sound unreal? Read the article that appeared in the LA Times, Chemicals in Home a Big Smog Source by Gary Polakovic, March 9, 2003. In it, we read: "Cleansers, cosmetics and other products pump 100 tons of pollutants daily into the Southland's air, ranking second to tailpipe emissions, studies show. Ordinary household products such as cleansers, cosmetics and paints are now the Los Angeles region's second-leading source of air pollution, after auto tailpipe emissions, air quality officials say. ..." (http://www.mindfully.org/Air/2003/Home-Chemicals-Smog9mar03.htm) "Accommodation" without access is not accommodation. This is what happens when even one individual is allowed to use and wear air-polluting perfumed products in the workplace that includes already scent-sensitized individuals, for which "accommodations" are supposedly being made. For the scent-sensitized individual, accommodation is an empty word without fragrance-free access. And, in most workplaces, fragrances could be controlled under the dress policy and no-smoking policy that already exist. Fragrance chemicals leave the user to adversely affect the air for all, just as do the chemicals assoicated with tobacco smoke. And like tobacco and alcohol, it appears that fragrance chemicals affect the brain. See Potentiation of GABAA receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes by perfume and phytoncid. by Aoshima H, Hamamoto K. at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=10361687&dopt=Abstract Human Resources managers and other management staff, please keep in mind William Gladstone's quote, "Justice delayed is justice denied." Using delaying tactics and escalating the requests for accommodation to the point of unreasonableness serves no one, while denigrating your fragrance-sensitized harbinger. Fragrance-sensitization is not "catching." But, as individual thresholds lower at differing rates, it can affect a growing number of employees . . . and that is preventable. One never knows when one will encounter that exposure to perfume that proves to be one-too-many and puts one over the edge into extreme fragrance sensitization. People do not "build immunity" to toxins. Their toxin thresholds lower, their health and abilities decline, often leading to disability. Your company, school, healthcare facility or agency will lose a valuable employee. Yet by instituting a "Cleaner Indoor Environmental Policy" you could spare the health of that fragrance-sensitized individual and untold others whose environmentally caused illnesses are still too insidious for most mainstream medical doctors -- who are notoriously poorly trained in environmental health -- to diagnose accurately.
The stats are in a publication by a multiagency group, including EPA, that tells us: A 1994 survey of environmental medicine content in US medical schools found that: "doctors are likely to have attended the 75 percent of the medical schools that require only seven hours training during their medical schooling." Health Care & Pesticides (National Strategies for Health Care Providers: Pesticides Initiative -- report's documentation: Schenk M, Popp SM, Neale AV, et al. Environmental medicine content in medical school curricula. Acad. Med. 1996;71(5):27-29. http://www.epa.gov/oppfead1/safety/healthcare/healthcare.htm) Developing a "fragrance-free accommodation" may sound scary to the employer, but it need not be. LISTEN to your fragrance-sensitized employee. Most solutions for that individual's level of sensitivity are easily achieved IF you have encouraged a polite, responsive workforce in the first place. Of course, if you gain your knowledge from the chemical industry front organizations and apologists, geared to stultifying the already fragrance-sensitized indivdual, you may find yourself free of that otherwise valuable but fragrance-sensitized employee . . . plus a few more employees whose bodies will react adversely to the proliferation of nonessential products synthesized from hydrocarbons. Workplaces that strive to clear the air for all have noticed that their workforce is more productive and sickleave is used less often. True Indoor Environmental Quality makes economic sense. It makes health sense. IEQ makes access a part of accommodation. We ask that folks do not wear perfume, cologne, aftershave and other scented products including clothing laundreed with highly scented detergents and fabric softeners to work (healthcare facility, school, place of worship, office, etc.). We ask that our colleagues, fellow meeting attendees, etc., use the versions of personal care products and laundry products that do not contain petrochemical-derived fragrances. But that isn't asking for an unreasonable accommodation . . . not with the plethora of fragrance-free products now openly advertised on radio and television, and readily available in the market. We are not asking that our colleagues (managers, doctors and nurses, teachers, students, etc.) not use fragrances to their heart's content in their own homes. That is their prerogative. But if they choose to use these products, which are released to market without substantiation of safety, I strongly and sincerely suggest that they use them only among nonpregnant, consenting adults. We also may ask that those who use scents to wear clean clothes that have not been saturated with fabric softeners or their various fragrance products from previous wearings. Asking that others wear clean clothes -- How outlandish a request is that? Remember, even the fragrance industry admits that scent cannot clean*. The proliferation of petrochemically derived perfumed products pollutes the air. For all. Save the air for the already chemically injured and you will save the air for the not-yet injured. Chronic diseases such as asthma and other upper and lower respiratory diseases, cancers, migraine and other headaches, Parkinson's, rheumatoid arthritis, etc., are as much an ENVIRONMENTAL ILLNESS as is MCS. These diseases and many more can be caused, triggered or exacerbated by petrochemical-derived fragrance products. Go GREEN. True green means the product: "... Must not contain petrochemical-derived fragrances. ..." U.S. Dept. of the Interior at http://www.doi.gov/greening/sustain/trad.html *August 2004: The fragrance industry recognizes that perfumes "cannot clean the air." What you also have to be mindful of are the products that give the air "no smell at all" -- those, too, are petrochemically derived and are harmful to health. There's just no telltale odor. See RIFM RESPIRATORY SAFETY PROGRAM at http://www.rifm.org/WHITE%20PAPER%20IAQ%20DIsola%20v2%2004082004.htm We ALL are stakeholders when it comes to breathing.
Best wishes to all of you!
|
- You should know and make known -
Fragrance-FREE environments! Excerpted from their policy (2000): "... While many questions are yet to be answered, the Board believes in doing what it can where it can. As a result, the Board has adopted a policy for its meetings and public gatherings that will help reduce exposure to personal fragrances. Under this policy, the Board requests that all participants refrain from wearing perfume, cologne and other fragrances, and use unscented personal care products in order to promote a fragrance-free environment. ..." http://www.access-board.gov/about/policies/fragrance.htm
NOTE: 41705 deals with agricultural odors.
CALIFORNIA: RULE 402. NUISANCE
(Why does this rule not include fabric softeners that pollute entire neighborhoods?)
The provisions of this rule shall not apply to odors emanating from
agricultural operations necessary for the growing of crops or the raising of
fowl or animals.
Access Board [United States]
Canadian Centre for Occupational and Health Safety (CCOHS)
Centers for Disease Control and PREVENTION
Fragrances: a no-non-scents approach [ . . . in Canada]
Fragrances and Aromatic Substances should not be used indiscriminately indoors
Mirrored on EHN's site, by permission
GREEN: The Department of the Interior states under its http://www.doi.gov/greening/sustain/trad.html
Analyses will show, fragrances contain carcinogens, mutagens or teratogens, and, as
Health Care Without Harm's info on
Perfumes and Asthma - don't mix
EHN's version is a slightly different, tri-fold brochure, approved of by Dr. J.Anderson. -- barb
"Perfume is a major toxic that renders public spaces inaccessible for many. In my
Life Impact study, almost half of the participants were unable to access any public
areas in which perfume was likely to be encountered. ..."
NIEHS (National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences)
Recordability Of Asthma Attack Due To Perfume At Work
"REGULATORY REVIEW -- "Yes. An occupational illness is recordable when workplace conditions contribute to or aggravate a medical condition, even if the condition is a pre-existing condition. In general, each work-related asthmatic episode is recordable as a new case since it is triggered by a new exposure. ..." [emphasis added] http://tis.eh.doe.gov/rl/pres/docs/D9701009.HTM (July 2004) Still available through the Wayback Machine http://web.archive.org/web/20030225072107/http://tis.eh.doe.gov/rl/pres/docs/D9701009.HTM
Sierra Club's "98.12.01 Excessive Use of Fragrance Products in Public Places"
Toxic Fragrances
The United States Access Board has adopted a policy to promote
Fragrance-FREE environments!
Access Board and Indoor Air Quality (2001)
Access Board Meetings
Board Issues New Accessibility Guidelines for Recreation Facilities (2002)
|
Access -- Suggestions Please take time to look at the information under the various topics. Information provided under hospitals, will also serve another workplace, a school, a place of worship, ... Use this information to help build your request for scent-free accommodation. Scent-free is not a question of personal preference, it is a question of health. Of life. And if none of the suggestions provided on this page work, there's always . . . Give-a-hint -Send a FREE anonymous e-postcard
http://www.give-a-hint.com/html/p-cologne.html Too much perfume . . . to women http://www.give-a-hint.com/html/p-perfume.html which by its very nature makes it a more direct approach. The problem with education, however, is someone has to be willing to exchange information and to learn. Sadly, in my former workplace, when I tried to explain about the chemicals used to make synthetic scents and pesticides, I was told by enough, "Oh, I don't want to hear that, it just makes me nervous." My counter that not wanting to learn could make you sick was not warmly greeted either. I'm sure there was a better method . . . I just never quite got it together -- hence, I'm here, not there. -- barb
|
Access for People With EI/MCS
Action Letters
Disaster Planning
Fragrance-free policy statements -- See Cities, Hospitals, Universities, Meeting Notices, Schools, States, et al., on this page
The Word IS Out! |
Access/Accommodation (Common Courtesy)
Fragrance: When you encounter the word or the potion,
don't think flower petals and animal essences, think volatilizing petrochemicals and alcohol.
When you read the word "irritant" as in statements such as "avoid other irritants,"
think of irritant as defined by Oxford Dictionary: POISON. Fragrances are recognized
lung IRRITANTS and SENSITIZERS.To smell fragrances is to inhale violatile petrochemical toxins that have not been proved safe for
inhalation, for neurotoxity, for their hormonal disrupting capabilities, for their carcinogenic
capabilities, for their teratogenic capabilities (effects upon developing embryos and fetuses).
Fragrances are invisible chemical barriers to access for the already chemically injured.
And, those still thinking of themselves as not having any problems with fragrances, What will
your future hold? No one can remain too smug about toxic brews released to market
without substantiation of safety by any government oversight agency. You, the user, must take
the wearing and using of fragrance products on faith. Blind faith.
PREVENTION: An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. -- Ben Franklin
Why use toxic chemical concoctions known simply as"fragrance" on the label of products?
Check labels of personal care items, cosmetics, and cleaning and maintenance products.
Goodness, even products labeled fragrance-free are allowed to contain synthetic fragrances.
They are ubiquitous. There are safer alternative products available. Also, rely on products such
as your grandmother used like baking soda, vinegar, salt, and yes, good old sunshine. They are
effective and inexpensive. More can be learned from EHN's section on Clean at
http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnlinx/c.htm#CleanHave you thought that by using synthetic scents you are not being GREEN as defined by
the US Department of the Interior? ( http://www.doi.gov/greening/sustain/trad.html)
Also, you are helping grow that burgeoning profit margin enjoyed by another facet of the
chemical industry, the pharmaceutical industry. One might see consumers as the goose that
have laid the golden eggs. (You know what happened to THAT goose.) -- barb
Acute toxic effects of fragrance products.
Author/s: Rosalind C. Anderson
http://www.zeal.com/exit.jhtml?cid=991790&wid=60362997&so=&xr=/website/profile.jhtml%3Fcid%3D991790%26wid%3D60362997OR, printer friendly: http://www.zeal.com/exit.jhtml?cid=991790&wid=60362997&so=&xr=/website/profile.jhtml%3Fcid%3D991790%26wid%3D60362997
For more information on the Andersons of Anderson Labs, see
http://www.andersonlaboratories.com/We also learn from the American Academy of Dermatology in their article,
"Allergies: The Culprit Could Be Hiding In Your Cosmetic Bag" --
http://www.newswise.com/articles/2000/3/ALLERGY.AAD.html
"Dermatologists recommend that people who experience allergic contact dermatitis adhere
Great advice as far as it goes. But, again, the subject of fragrances is being dealt with as if it is
to the following program to avoid some of the most probable offending agents, with specific
patch testing performed once the dermatitis is clear:
-- For clothing care, double rinse all detergents and avoid all fabric softeners.
-- Try to wear pure, untreated cotton in light colors. Avoid permanent press or
cotton blends. Silk and polyester are acceptable.-- Wash all new clothing items five times before wearing.
-- Use only fragrance-free soaps, body cleansers, shampoos and conditioners.
-- Avoid all perfumes, colognes, and after-shaves.
-- Do not use any fingernail care products or hair spray.
"The American Academy of Dermatology, founded in 1938, is the largest, most influential,
and most representative of all dermatologic associations. ..."
a problem unique to that one individual who is wearing fragrances and all that one individual
has to do is to AVOID USING scented products.It is the nature of this volatile petrochemical beast to become one with the air we all must breathe.
That "thorough" testing you read about regarding fragrances is for dermatological reactions
of the primary user. The industry and our federal government have not tested for effects to
brain and central nervous system of developing embryos and fetuses, to infants and children,
to adults ranging in age through the eldest among us; nor have they tested for carcinogenic effects;
they've not tested for long-term and systemic effects; nor have they even gone so far as to give
a mind to the dermatological effects suffered by non-users simply from being in the air that is
contaminated with polluting fragrance products. NEVER MEASURE. NEVER MANAGE!To spell out the obvious: Our modern fragrances are volatile organic compounds, therefore they
become the air we all must breathe. Synthetic scents are not tested for reactions to skin beyond
those of the primary user.When will our government agencies and health care societies begin to look at the fact that
fragrances contain volatile chemicals that are known or suspected hormone disrupters, irritants
(and here, please think of mucus production and inflamation, not just something that is
emotionally irritating like another person's booming music), sensitizers (causes adverse reactions
in normal tissue after repeated exposures), carcinogens (capable of causing cancer), tertatogens
(adversely affecting embryonic and fetal development) and neurotoxins (adversely affecting brain
and nervous systems)?Fragrances should be tested BEFORE marketing for their adverse effects upon users and
nonusers who suffer adverse events at secondary and tertiary levels of exposure. Fragrances
should be tested for their effects upon the reproductive systems of developing fetuses, as well
effects on males and females of all ages. Fragrances should be researched for their effects upon
the respiratory systems of users and non users; for their neurotoxic effects upon users and
non users; for their potential cancer- causing capabilities for users and non users.Come to think of it, if there is synthetic scent in the air, we all are users! Fragrances should be
tested for more than just dermatological adverse reactions to the primary user, and the public
should be informed. The public has a right to know. The public has a right to make their purchases
via informed consent.
See Raw Materials of Perfumery
http://www.perfumersworld.com/chems/material.htmSynthetic fragrances are in household and janitorial cleaning and
maintenance products, including air "fresheners," pesticides and disinfectants
(which are classified as pesticides by the EPA). And synthetic scents are in your
personal care products, which you put on your body and the bodies of your children.
Synthetically scented products are more than just your perfume, cologne and aftershave.Whether you personnaly use synthetic fragrances or breathe them in because others
use them, these chemicals CAN adversely affect your health. Often, the early stages
of chemical injury are too insidious for the untrained mainstream medical doctor to
recognize and diagnose. Remember: Doctors have failed to recognize and properly
diagnose many debilitating and disabling diseases, which have since become recognized.
For instance, asthma, pellagra, tuberculous. Regarding asthma, it was not that long ago
that the sages were stating that asthma was all psychosomatic.Often we who suffer adverse reactions to toxic chemicals, such as fragrances, are termed
"allergic." But that is a misnomer. We have really been poisoned by those chemicals --
which are, at the very least, irritants and sensitizers. At worse, fragrance compounds
contain known or suspected neurotoxins (adversely affecting brain and nervous systems),
carcinogens (capable of causing cancer), tergatogens (adversely affecting embryonic
and fetal development) and/or hormone disrupters, which can adversely affect developing
fetuses, children and adults . . . male and female.Our body's response really isn't that of allergy and therefore, a Human Resource
manager, or other member of management (speaking from personal experience!) who
"diagnose" our cases and "prescribe" allergy shots could cause great harm if the
chemically injured person were wrongly convinced to give that treatment a try.
Remember, mainstream medical doctors have not been trained to recognize the insidious
symptoms of chemical poisoning ... not even when the poisoning is from pesticides, and
their patients explain why and how they have been put in harm's way.Alas, most people don't realize when they've been poisoned by synthetic scents for they
believe that fragrances are safe or they'd not be marketed. The industry is unregulated
and there is no pre-market testing required by our Food and Drug Administration for
inhalation, neurotoxicity or long-term, systemic effects. The most industry testing done
has been for effects to the skin of the primary user . . . completely ignoring all of the people
with adverse skin events from secondary exposures. Not to mention all of the people suffering
adverse respiratory and neurotoxic events due to inhalation.Proof that synthetic fragrances are toxic chemical products, can be seen by visiting the
"FDA Petition."Click out to "Analyses" and "Product Label." Print out the information
and take IT to your leader.
FDA Petition - http://www.ehnca.org/FDApetition/bkgrinfo.htm
Once you learn of the chemicals used to concoct scents, it isn't so surprising to learnAnalyses - http://www.ehnca.org/FDApetition/bkgrinfo.htm#Analyses
Analysis Summary - Are you surprised at the number of chemicals
Product Label - http://www.ehnca.org/FDApetition/eterbkpg.htm
about which we know too little toxicological data, or that appear on the EPA's
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory and the Registry of Toxic Effects
of Chemical Substances (RTECS). See http://www.ehnca.org/FDApetition/analysis.htm
that synthetic scents in personal care and cleaning/maintenance products, and other
commonly used consumer products with high-emitting VOCs (volatile organic
compounds), can cause and/or exacerbate cold- and flu-like illnesses; dizziness, migraines
andother headaches; upper and lower respiratory diseases including asthma, sinusitis,
rhinitis and laryngitis; nausea; gastro-intestinal problems; incontinence; ...
Let's learn a little more by visiting the following sites.Selected Abstracts on the Health Effects of Perfume
Earth Angels Association/Health & Environment Resource Center
http://members.aol.com/chemxpose/abstracts.htmlAnd from the industry . . .
"COMMON SENSE ABOUT SCENTS." See
SPEIAC
http://www.scentedproducts.on.ca/hdnad.jpgLet's take a gander at the words of Scented Products Education and
Information Association of Canada (SPEIAC) in their ad published
following their press conference in Halifax, Nova Scotia, June 20, 2000 --
See EHN's page, Halifax at http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnlinx/aaprbb.htmThe ad states in part: "The composition of perfumes hasn't changed much in
hundreds of years. They contain primarily water and alcohol -- of the same
type and purity we drink in beverages -- as well as essential fragrance oils." Do
notice that line about water and alcohol. Remember that when you read and
further investigate the information below. We do not drink denatured alcohol.
Do we really think the industry will pay the taxes to use "drinking alcohol"? -- barb
Perfume World - Raw Materials of Perfumery
This site respects one's right to know and for that I give them my heartfelt thanks. So with this
info available, check out that right-hand column! And remember, we are the guinea pigs . . .
even if we are not the primary user of synthetic scents. We "use" them on the secondary and
tertiary levels.-- barb
http://www.perfumersworld.com/chems/material.htm
Fragrance Tips (submenu under Features)
The industry suggests layering and then has the effrontery to state that everyone has a
" 'scent circle,' approximately an arm's length from the body." The industry makes these toxic
chemical preparations to be smelled at great distances -- the concoctions are formulated to
waft further and last longer, and THEN the industry states the user should observe the "scent
circle." LUDICROUS! But obviously, scented products customers will buy anything . . . even
the industry cleverly putting the blame for odorovecting on their customers.But, if users of scented products have an industry declared "scent circle" that they are not
supposed to exceed, then by George we have our own arm's length of distance that their
chemical outgassings should not penetrate. If you react to the toxic chemical scent concoctions
used or worn by folks further away than your arm's length, be sure to claim your legitimate space
of cleaner air. Of course, try to claim your arm's length while being examined by a doctor,
having blood drawn by a nurse, while in a crowded elevator or on a public transit conveyance.
http://www.fragrance.org/feature_tip_content.htmlAnd then, a little advice from Career Corner on GovExec.com:
"Avoid perfume or cologne. It may not help and may hurt."
By Kathryn Kraemer; June 29, 1999
http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0699/062999cc.htm
By the way, if links no longer work, you may have luck finding them if you use
The WayBack Machine at http://www.archive.org
Thanks to all who wrote to the US ACCESS Board
"The Access Board is an independent Federal agency devoted to accessibility for people
with disabilities." (From About the Board)
E-mail: info@access-board.gov
http://www.access-board.gov/
Because you cared enough ... Look at what your efforts wrought.
Applaud the Access Board and take a bow for yourself! -- barb
"[U.S. Access] Board Adopts Policy to Promote Fragrance-Free Environments"