MCS: You can't "catch" it, but you can prevent it.
MCS takes life. It takes it in quality. It takes it ultimately, prematurely. My efforts are dedicated to all who are experiencing life with MCS and to the memory of those who have suffered premature death because of it.
Live the adage: An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure!
|
MCS is a physiological (NOT psychological) malady
known worldwide, affecting all ages, genders and races. -- barb
| A
B
C
D
EF
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
Clicking on the alpha character above will take you to another page of links.
Since I began building EHN's site, the amount of good information has grown -- along with the
Well, this overwhelming page should tell you -- and them -- that you are not alone. Research takes
Personally, my health has improved. It has taken years after getting out of a toxic workplace,
We'll all stand a chance of recovery -- and better yet, PREVENTION -- once the powers that be
Help yourself and others, start unloading your "body burden" by demanding safer,
We ALL are stakeholders when it comes to breathing.© -- barb
California Health and Safety Code 41700
NOTE: 41705 deals with agricultural odors.
Chemical Sensitivity (MCS)
DEFINING CHEMICAL INJURY: A Diagnostic Protocol and Profile of
Definition of Disabling MCS/EI used by Ecology House Inc.
Ecology House, San Rafael, CA
Government and Medical Science Finally Recognize
MCS: A Sensitive Issue
MCS America
MCS Facts (from movie, Exposed by Heidrun Holzfeind)d
MCS International links
MCS Consensus Statement, 1999 - 34 signatories
http://www.scienceblog.com/community/older/1999/B/199901461.html
MCS: Think "functional impairment," not diagnosis.
MCS Under Siege by Dr. Ann McCampbell
MCS: What It Is, What It Is Not, And How It Is Manifested
noFragrance.org
OUT of the MCS Closet! Sadly, we've since lost this coach.
WE SHARE THE AIR
EHN has a page dedicated to access and accommodation guidelines.
|
M -- MCS Category
Multiple Chemical Sensitivity
To skip the intro . . .
And with that I ask that you keep in mind: About the time there is focus on the toxic effects of the plethora of petrochemicals in our commonly used products -- and which upon inhaling and absorbing can become one with our bodies -- the industry apologists start coming forth with their hype about hypochondria, psychosomatic illness, et al.
The yet-to-become-ill hear how folks make themselves sick and all they need is psychotherapy and prescribed medicines. It sets up a divide. It becomes Darwinian socialism in the workplace, schools, healthcare facilities, ... everywhere, without a thought to tomorrow and the sudden turn of events that can happen to anyone with yet one more chemical assault. Sorely lacking is study of the effects of petrochemical-derived substances and products at cellular level. And without that, the still relatively healthy don't realize that MCS maybe just a breath away for them or their family members.
As pharmaceuticals are also synthesized from petrochemicals, plus spiked with the petrochemical-derived essences of the flavors and fragrance industry, it is no wonder to me that we so often fare better without drugs. Yet that flummoxes mainstream medical doctors who have not been adequately trained to even recognize symptoms of pesticide poisoning.1 It is no wonder to me that the medical industry has gone after our EI doctors with a vengeance.
The subject of Mulitple Chemical Sensitivity and all of its ramifications needs investigation. Not of the ill, not of our doctors and researchers who seek to understand and help us come to know of the effects of the myriad of chemicals upon our bodies. We need a thorough investigation of the perpetrators and those who have done nothing to help as public health has tanked.
I ask you to also keep in mind, the medical industry's tendency to mix apples and oranges, or in the case of those living with MCS, the mainstream medical doctors mix allergy and chemical sensitization. Think about what causes allergies . . . and you'll think of a lot of protein-based substances. Think of what causes MCS . . . chemicals. And most of those chemicals are highly volatile and found in commonly used personal care products, as well as household and janitorial cleaning and maintenance products. I ask also that you keep in mind that there isn't just one chemical in any of the products in daily use. So with that in mind, it is good to be wary of phthalate laden products and know that phthalates are a commonly used fragrance ingredient to help make that scent last, but there are more harmful chemicals in fragrances than just phthalates!
You will find -- if you analyze a fragrance -- chemicals that are known or suspected carcinogens (capable of causing cancer), hormone disrupters, irritants (defined by Oxford Dictionary as POISON), neurotoxins (affecting brain and nervous systems), sensitizers (fragrance chemicals were known lung sensitizers back in 1977), and teratogens (capable of causing embryonic and fetal development problems). That's a heady brew to be unleashing upon an unsuspecting, inadequately informed public. In my estimation.
There has been a rush to get products to market with no thought of consequences to health of users, let alone non-users who are adversely affected secondhand. Our government agencies are without proper authority as the industry is self-regulated and protected by outmoded trade secret laws. "Rip-off" products demonstrate that modern technology allows copy. Why should trade secret protection keep our health agencies in the dark? To keep the buying public in the dark seems to highlight the need to hide the truth about petrochemical-derived essences for flavors and fragrances. The public's right to know has been pre-empted by an industry in pursuit of the almighty dollar.
I want doctors and researchers to start seriously looking at the effects of flavored and scented products. Some have started looking at pesticides and that is good, but fragrances and flavors are still off their radar screen. In the meantime, I ask that they stop with their oft-repeated, one-word non-explanation explanation "UNEXPLAINED" when asked about the soaring rates of asthma and other upper and lower respiratory diseases, cancers, migraines, ataxia, aphasia and other central nervous system disorders, of Parkinson's and Alzhiemer's, of ADD and ADHD, CFIDS, lupus, ... And just about the time a doctor states that that's too many diseases, think about the thousands of inadequately tested chemicals used just by the flavors and fragrance industry. The tens to hundreds of individual chemicals in any one flavor or fragrance can cause any number of adverse reactions . . . and diseases. Further, know, that that doesn't even begin to touch the total number -- tens of thousands -- of chemicals released to market unsubstantiated for safety.
There's something terribly wrong in not looking at the adverse effects of absorbing and inhaling volatile organic compounds from flavors and fragrances while simply dismissing the soaring rates of various chronic diseases and premature deaths, affecting people worldwide -- all races, ages, genders -- as UNEXPLAINED.
--barb
1. The quote is from a publication by a multiagency group, including EPA:
|
Note, if a link doesn't work, try to search for the title via Google.com.
Some links change often. Sometimes information is removed. I cannot keep up.
This section on Multiple Chemical Sensitivity includes
organizations serving folks living with MCS. If you know of
other organizations you feel should be listed here, please inform.
An interesting note: I've heard complaints that there is
"too much good information." Now doesn't that start to tell
those who poo-poo MCS a thing or ten? -- barb
![]()
To accentuate the obvious, the word above is "physiological," not "psychological." Multiple
And lest I be judged as not giving due consideration to the effects of "mind over
To my mind, that is a convenient "red herring" to avoid looking at, and acknowldging
We are the harbingers of the effects of MATTER over mind.
I, among so many activists, have always said, "It is only a matter of time" . . . until MCS and
In the meantime, how many more of our environmental doctors will be subjected to "witch hunts"
Just look at the composition of products sold as benign, our commonly used perfumes, cosmetics
YOU better start making wiser purchases of safer products.
You can save petroleum AND save the air. Consumer products contribute big time to smog, also
Now, onto the links. I make no guarantees that they are all working, but they were when I built
Chemical Sensitivity (MCS) is also known as Environmental Illness (EI), Chemical Injury (CI),
20th Century Illness, TILT ... The more names, the more confusing; the more the chemical
industry apologists and undereducated mainstream medical doctors can stultify us. (The
stats are in a publication by a multiagency group, including EPA, that tells us: "doctors are likely
to have attended the 75 percent of the medical schools that require only seven hours training
during their medical schooling." Health Care & Pesticides (a multiagency -- National
Strategies for Health Care Providers: Pesticides initiative report's documentation: Schenk M,
Popp SM, Neale AV, et al. Environmental medicine content in medical school curricula. Acad.
Med. 1996;71(5):27-29.)
matter," let me assure you that those of us who live with EI/MCS function because we
know how important the mind-body connection is and we work with that. However, I
do get a bit testy at the suggestion that we do not understand that our illnesses are --
or can be -- psychological in nature.
the true situation: ubiquitous synthetic chemicals! Those psychological or stress diagnoses
also make convenient excuses for pushing drugs, er ah, writing prescriptions for drugs such
as Prozac. The chemical industry benefits. But do you?
Before getting into the plethora of links available from this page -- THAT, in and of itself
should indicate just how widespread the adverse events are as a result of our modern reliance
on synthetic chemical products, including prescribed and OTC drugs, personal care products,
household and janitorial cleaning and maintenance products, ... Please read the following features.
A worthwhile read! And, at the top of the page, you'll find,
Sick, Yes--Psycho, No
People With Multiple Chemical Sensitivities Fight To Be Believed
by Will Moredock.
http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/Spa/4415/bestscience.html#Best
by Mark Moranstaff, HEALTH & SCIENCE,
Quoting Mr. Moranstaff:
"... Everybody sees [such [MCS] patients]," said Myron Genel, MD, chair of AMA's Council
It's not so hard to figure out why MCS is denied a position as a medical disorder. It is the
on Scientific Affairs and associate dean at Yale University School of Medicine, New
Haven, Conn. "They go up and down the food chain of medical specialists and get no
relief. They are ill, but a precise scientific understanding and definition has been elusive."
"In 1991, the council approved a report stating that there were "no well controlled studies
establishing a clear mechanism or cause" for MCS. Dr. Genel said the council considered
revisiting the topic this year, but found no compelling evidence to change its
earlier conclusions.
economy of the chemical industry and its various facets. We are on a not-so-merry-chemical-go-
'round! It isn't lost on me that in 1991 the AMA's council came to its conclusion . . . that followed
just a little too closely, the then Chemial Manufacturers Association's 1990 publication of the
daming call-to-arms "Environmental Illness Briefing Paper." Certainly, Dr. Grace Ziem sees what
would lie ahead for the industry IF the mainstream chemical medical industry would
acknowledge MCS. "What would happen if it [MCS] were recognized as a diagnosis?" Dr. Ziem asked.
"Reasonable accommodation would be required in public places, meaning
that we would have nontoxic pest control, nontoxic air fresheners, and less-toxic
cleaning agents. The chemical industry is quite aware that if this condition became
recognized, there would be sales implications in the billions [of dollars]."
http://www.ama-assn.org/sci-pubs/amnews/pick_99/hlta0809.htm
Should anyone think the chemical industry is not the driving force behind MCS
"controversy" and its not being recognized by the mainstream medical industry,
read the Chemical Manufacturers Association's 1990 call-to-arms,
Environmental Illness Briefing Paper.
chemical injury become recognized by mainstream medical. Our numbers are swelling and at such
time as it is seen as a business liability to continue to ignore our pleas for cleaner air and less
toxic products, MCS will be recognized. Please remember, the medical industry was not so
swift on the topic of asthma or tuberculosis or pellagra, either.
and have to fight for their medical licenses?How many millions upon millions more people will
have to live with and die prematurely from the toxins volatilizing from commonly used
consumer products released to market without adequate testing? How long before mainstream
medical doctors are educated to recognize symptoms of chemical injury? How long before medical
doctors learn to not simply write a prescription for mind-altering drugs, artificially swelling
the ranks of folks who have been diagnosed as having "psychological" problems, who in reality
live with MCS? This is a physiological malady. Anything that manifests itself as psychological
may well be the result of MCSers having to deal with a medical system, a justice system,
schools and workplaces that just don't get it. Get IT that cleaner air for the already chemically
injured means healthier air for all.
and scented personal care products, plus all of the scented products used for household and
janitorial cleaning and maintenance chores. They contain chemicals that are known or suspected
carcinogens (capable of causing cancer), hormone disrupters, irritants (read: POISON),
neurotoxins (affecting your brain and nervous systems), sensitizers (skin and lungs) and
teratogens (adversely affect developing embryos and fetuses).
Folks, there is no FDA or EPA government regulation that's going to save your health, your lives.
The flavors and fragrance industry is self regulated. It is further protected by trade secret laws
and fragmentation of government authority . . . such as it is.
to water pollution, as synthetic scents, drugs, et al., do not "wash out" in waste treatment
practices. You can purchase eco-friendly, petroleumn-, fragrance- and dye-free household and
janitorial products -- and by doing so, you'll not only save the air, but you'll save on the use of
petroleum too. You can purchase paints, carpets, adhesives that have lower-emitting VOCs
(volatile organic compounds). And, you can purchase personal care products that are not
synthetically scented (Hint, look for ORGANICS . . . and near organics, because "fragrance-
free" or "unscented" on the label means nothing; by law, such products can carry a masking
scent.) The sooner we all start making safer, wiser purchases, the better for all of us AND
our fish and wildlife downstream, too.
Before you get started scrolling through the links below, I'd like to direct your attention to some
papers that I consider "Must reads!" Those on MCS are also listed at the top of this page.
This is the paper I've dubbed the industry's call-to-arms. Read it carefully. Take special note of
their "Forming Coalition." Now, all you naysayers, tell me MCS is psychological. I'm likely to
counter with we are the victims of not only chemical poisoning, but psychological warfare.
http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/books/cmaeibri.htm
By Betty Bridges, RN; Flavours and Fragrance, the industry's journal
http://www.fpinva.org/FragranceReview.htm
http://www.heldref.org/aehmcs.php
http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnlinx/mcssiege.htm
By Shelia Bastien, PhD; © July 20, 1995
http://users.lmi.net/wilworks/newreact/sbastien.htm
them. Sometimes sites change their pages or their servers, and the links die. Should that
happen, use a search engine and see if you can find their new home. IF you find a replacement
link, please let me know and I'll fix it on EHN's site as soon as possible. Thanks. -- barb
![]()
A Canary's Eye View
http://www.loudzen.com/canary/index.html
A Review of the Scientific Literature As It Pertains to Gulf War Illness
Includes a chapter on MCS, chapter 11. Also, if you are looking for info on GWS,
please visit the site of Alison Johnson and her Chemical Sensitivity Foundation. -- barb
http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1018.2/index.html
ABCGED (Association of BC Government Employees with Disabilities)
Achieving Healthy Indoor Air
Report of the ATS Workshop: Santa Fe, New Mexico, November 16-19, 1995
THIS WORKSHOP REPORT WAS APPROVED BY THE ATS BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
MARCH 1997
Other Point Sources in Homes and Offices
" . . . Control of pollution sources is incomplete if the odors from the occupants are not
minimized. Perfumes are among the most difficult to control since they are perceived
by their users as pleasurable. Personal rights and preferences for perfumed products
must be evaluated against the discomfort that scents cause for some people. The
odoriferous materials are highly volatile synthetic chemicals; in effect, they contribute
to the total VOCs. Scented personal products are not limited to perfumes; they include
residual scents on clothing from detergents and fabric softeners, soaps, shampoos,
deodorants, skin lotions, and cosmetics. The only successful method of control is to
eliminate these odors, either by avoiding their use, as with perfumes, or by using
unscented products. ...
Two-bits' worth by barb: Let me assure everyone, it is not mere "discomfort that scents
cause for some people," although, they too, should not have to be forced to inhale another person's
choice of odor. But for the already chemically injured -- POISONED -- it can be a life and death
situation. Now, how can any employer, school administrator, healthcare administrator and/or
management or executives of government entities, grant the right to odorovect toxic chemicals
from personal care products over another's right to breathe? I ask you. The goal should be
cleaner air for all; not the pleasure of wearing or using toxic synthetic fragrance products for some.
http://ajrccm.atsjournals.org/cgi/content/full/156/3/S33
Advocate-On-Line
Nova Scotia's Environmental Illness Online Newsletter
When online with RainForest, under "Choose a suburb,"
select "RainForest/Canopy" then view 4357
Air Quality - A look at Environmental Illness
Dan Knight; May 7, 2000
http://www.lowendmac.com/soapbox/air-quality.shtml
Alaska MCS Association
Tel/Fax (907) 243-5800
AllergyAlertCook.com
You can order "Allergy Alert Cookbook - The World's Best From East To West"
http://www.ALLERGYALERTCOOK.com/default.asp
Allergy and MCS Distinguished, C. S. Miller, N. A. Ashford
http://www.palantir.ca/PEC/research.html
Allergy and MCS Help
Dr. Cathcart
(Includes an MCS chat page.)
-- Try to wear pure, untreated cotton in light colors. Avoid permanent press or
cotton blends. Silk and polyester are acceptable.
-- Wash all new clothing items five times before wearing.
-- Use only fragrance-free soaps, body cleansers, shampoos and conditioners.
-- Avoid all perfumes, colognes, and after-shaves.
-- Do not use any fingernail care products or hair spray.
To spell out the obvious: Our modern fragrances are volatile organic compounds, therefore they
become the air we all must breathe. Synthetic scents are not tested for reactions to skin beyond
those of the primary user.
When will our government agencies and health care societies begin to look at the fact that
fragrances contain volatile chemicals that are known or suspected hormone disrupters, irritants,
sensitizers, carcinogens, tertatogens and neurotoxins? Fragrances should be tested BEFORE
marketing for their adverse effects upon users and nonusers who suffer adverse events at
secondary and tertiary levels of exposure. Fragrances should be tested for their effects upon the
reproductive systems of developing fetuses as well males and females of all ages. Fragrances should
be researched for their effects upon the respiratory systems of users and non users; for their
neurotoxic effects upon users and non users; for their potential cancer-causing capabilities for
users and non users. Come to think of it, if there is synthetic scent in the air, we all are users!.
And therein lies the reason more and more people are seeking fragrance-free accommodation! -- barb
http://www.newswise.com/articles/2000/3/ALLERGY.AAD.html
American Academy of Environmental Medicine
http://www.healthy.net/pan/pa/NaturalTherapies/aaem/index.html
Article (Membership only) about "...Drs. Rosalind C. and Julius H. Anderson [who]
investigated the respiratory toxicity of chemicals emitted by children's bedding..."
Anderson Labs
PO Box 323
West Hartford, VT 05084
Scientific papers -- $10.00 each
Arizona Technology Access Program
Institute for Human Development
Northern Arizona University
Or, available through this URL . . .
Asthma -- See EHN's General Links, page A, Asthma
http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnlinx/a.htm#Asthma
" More than 17 million Americans suffer from asthma, which is the seventh-ranking
chronic condition in America. " © 2000 American Lung Association.
http://www.lungusa.org/asthma/
Asthma in Schools [from EPA]
Perfumes, scented cleaning agents and air "fresheners" would be at the TOP of my list! -- barb
Each day, one in five Americans occupies a school building and the majority of these
occupants are children. Environmental asthma triggers commonly
found in school
buildings are cockroaches and other pests, mold resulting from excess moisture in the
building, and dander from animals in the classroom. Secondhand smoke and dust mites
are other known environmental asthma triggers found in schools. In addition, some
literature suggests children with asthma may be affected by other pollutants found
in schools from such sources as un-vented stoves or heaters and common products
such as cleaning agents, perfumes, and sprays. [Emphasis added.]
Effectively managing a child¼s asthma can best be accomplished through a comprehensive
plan that addresses both the medical management of the disease and avoidance of
environmental triggers. Since children spend most of their time in schools, day care
facilities, or at home, it is important to reduce their exposure to environmental asthma
triggers as much as possible in each of these environments. This publication focuses on
steps that schools can take to help children breathe easier.
http://www.epa.gov/iaq/schools/asthma/asthma_in_schools.htm
Asthma, The Segal Guide to
Dr. Segal says: "Avoid perfume"
http://segal.org/asthma/
ATSDR - MCS Report, Predecision Draft
EHN's Response
http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/atsdr/atsdrlet.htm
Attitudes Regarding MCS (Multiple Chemical Sensitivities)
by Barbara Herskovitz January 26, 1999
http://www.fiscorp.net/iaq/iaqapps4.html
Arizona Technology Access Program
Avoid Fragrances: Adverse Reactions to Fragrances
Use the following clickables to speed you along in the MCS category:
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q |
| R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z |
To top of page.
-- B --
SHEILA BASTIEN, Ph.D.
PSYCHOLOGICAL CORP.
2126 Los Angeles Avenue
Berkley, CA 94707-2618
(510) 526-7391
FAX 525-9601
"Multiple Chemical Sensitivities (MCS):
What It Is, What It Is Not, And How It Is Manifested"
By Shelia Bastien, PhD; © July 20, 1995
http://users.lmi.net/wilworks/newreact/sbastien.htm
Best Environmental Directories
with worldwide links
http://www.ulb.ac.be/ceese/meta/cds.html
The Best Science Money Can Buy
By Will Moredock
http://web.cln.com/archives/charlotte/newsstand/c031498/cover11.htm
Bibliography
( Presented on May 12 and 13, 1994 to officials of the Departments of Defense and
Veterans Affairs and officials of the Environmental Protection Agency and ATSDR.)
Irritable bowel syndrome and Crohn's disease
Migraine
Arthritis
Cerebral symptoms
Unexplained fatigue
Abacterial cystitis and bladder pain
Multi-system polysymptomatic illness"
http://www.minotaur.org.uk/webdesign/sites/bsaenm_index.html
Adrienne Buffaloe, MD
Chemical Sensitivity - It's a Serious Problem More Often Than You Think!!!
http://www.accessnewage.com/articles/health/chemical.htm
Business Directory - MCS/CI
Our goals in offering this Directory are to:
Offer persons with MCS/CI a listing of businesses owned and/or
managed by persons with MCS/CI
Offer an avenue for persons with MCS/CI to promote their businesses
http://www.naturescountrystore.com/links/links.html
-- C --
California: MCS/CFIDS... Organizations
http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnlinx/mcscalif.htm
Canada
See International section, below
A Canary's Eye View
http://www.loudzen.com/canary/index.html
CanaryNews
MCS: Health & Environment [note the ampersand], is a Chicago-based
national support group for the chemically sensitive; 1404 Judson Avenue,
Evanston, IL 60201; fax 847-733-0665; phones 630-529-1342, 847-253-0142,
and 847-866-9630.
We offer meetings with speakers; a 39-page Resource Guide; an extensive lending library
of audiotapes, videotapes, books, and other documents; and a bi-monthly newsletter,
CanaryNews, of which sample copies are available on request.
Membership is $20 a year (or whatever you can afford), sent to
John Truskowski
251 Kimberly
Lake Forest, IL 60045.
Please make check out to "MCS: Health & Environment."
Candles
http://www.eisc.ca/blacksoot.htm
http://www.eisc.ca/burning-dilema.htm
CFIDS
See, EHN's General Links, page C, CFIDS
http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnlinx/c.htm#CFIDS
Changes in Levels of Nerve Growth Factor in Nasal Secretions after Capsaicin
Inhalation in Patients with Airway Symptoms from Scents and Chemicals
Eva Millqvist, Ewa Ternesten-Hass»us, Arne St¬hl,1 and Mats Bende
Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 113, Number 7, July 2005
http://www.ehponline.org/members/2005/7657/7657.html
Chat about MCS
http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnlinx/c.htm#Chat
Chemical Awareness
"Background information:
A European NGO-campaign on chemicals policy
By Allan Andersen, The Danish Society for the Conservation of Nature,
Christian Ege Joergensen, The Danish Ecological Council, and Poul Wendel Jessen,
The Danish Consumer Council.
"The whole framework of directives, which make up EU chemicals policy, is now under
revision. It is crucial that environmental and consumer NGO¼s become actively
involved in formulating the chemicals policy of the future. To strengthen NGO efforts,
we ask all NGO¼s and other interested parties to support the Chemicals Campaign
outlined below.
"During the most recent 50 years of industrial development, the production of chemicals
has increased 3-400 times on a global scale. Of the 10-15 million substances known
today, at least 100,000 chemical substances can be found individually as industrially
manufactured-marketed substances.
"We give names to and know chemical formulas of practically all of these substances.
However, even though we have dramatically increased our knowledge of the biological
significance of chemical substances, we know very little - or often nothing at all - about
the biological effects of an overwhelming majority of the man-made chemicals. . . . "
http://www.fbr.dk/chemaware/about/index.html
"The threat to environment and health presented by chemicals is a lot more far-reaching
than previously assumed by European authorities. After many years of intensive
studies the Danish Environmental Agency is soon to publish a list of 20,000 chemical
substances with undesired effects on environment or health.
"So far EU has only listed some 5,000 substances as dangerous.
"The 20,000 substances now assessed by the DK Environmental Agency, using computer
modelling, were hardly known previously in terms of their harmful effects.
"The Agency identified the substances based on a study investigating a total of 50,000
marketed substances. A common feature is that little or no information is available on
those substances. And why? Simply because they came on the market before there were
ever any claims for thorough assessments.
"With their new study the Agency has now spotlighted a hitherto practically boundless
problem - the tens of thousands of chemicals whose effects nobody was aware of till now . . . "
http://www.fbr.dk/chemaware/newslet/issue11/article1.html
İ
İ
Chemical Injury
by Barb Wilkie
NOTE: The email address for the FDA is fdadockets@oc.fda.gov
http://www.dizbiz.com/twbb/wwwboard/messages/2.html
Chemical Injury Awareness Project (Ribbons)
EBB!----Every Body's Backyard! 501(c)3 non-profit organization
Recognizing the Health Effects of Environmental Toxins
Maggie MacRaven -- President
P O Box 1156, Tijeras, NM 87059
http://ebb.freeshell.org/
print: http://www.abqtrib.com/print/index.cfm
Chemical-injury Survivors of Minnesota
http://www.holoweb.com/survivors/default.htm
THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS OF THE POST POLIO SYNDROME
*W.J. Rea, M. D., F. A. C. S., A.R. Johnson, D. O., **E. Fenyves, Ph. D., J. Butler, Ph. D.
http://www.aehf.com/articles/A56.htm
|
Common symptoms of MCS This is my life! But more so, while I was gainfully employed. Eight years following early retirement, some of my worse symptoms have lessened. Now I'm into stage five renal disease. -- barb
This pretty much covers what causes my reactions. FRAGRANCE products were and are my biggest nemesis. They are ubiquitous and leave the users to affect everyone, regardless of age or stage of llife; including developing embryos and fetuses. The government should demand warnings be affixed to labels for use of artificial flavors and fragrances. I'd also add refineries and chemical plants to the following list. I suggest researchers and doctors think CARBON as opposed to looking at PROTEIN for an explanation of MCS. And, remember, our experts lament the soaring, "UNEXPLAINED" rates of asthma, cancers, alzheimer's Parkinson's, ADD, ADHD, CFIDS, lupus, birth defects, . . . you-name-it! I suggest that these be viewed as "Environmental Illnesses" caused by our reliance on petrochemically derived products, including pharmaceuticals, released to market without full substantiation of safety. -- barb
|
Chronic Fatigue and Immune Deficiency Syndrome
Also see EHN's http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnlinx/c.htm#CFIDS
CINDA
Very sorry to learn:
CHS Home
http://www.coloradohealthsite.org/
Consensus Statement, 1999: MCS
34 signatories
http://www.heldref.org/aehmcs.php
Consumer Information / Products of possible interest to the EI/MCS community
Coping With MCS
http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/Spa/4415/coping.html
The Cosmetic Health Report Inc
Use the following clickables to speed you along in the MCS category:
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q |
| R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z |
To top of page.
-- D --
Dance
Fragrances and the DOJ
Mr. Wodatch wrote in 1995: "In most circumstances, it would not be 'reasonable'
to require an employer to regulate such personal choices by its employees."
Folks, this ruling was written well after the EPA's report was released, from which
Julia Kendall compiled her work, Twenty Most Common Chemicals Found In
Thirty-one Fragrance Products (http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehn20.htm)
But, it was before EHN filed its Citizens' Petition with the FDA (http://www.ehnca.org/FDApetition/bkgrinfo.htm)asking
that they require their warning be affixed to labels of all fragrances released to market without
substantiation of safety. Since the FDA cannot require pre-market testing and it does not test, how can it NOT require it's message: "WARNING: The safety of this product has not been determined." ???? See "FDA Authority Over Cosmetics" http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/cos-206.html -- barb
Or available via
http://web.archive.org/web/20011004225836/http://www.ama-assn.org/sci-pubs/amnews/pick_99/hlta0809.htm#s1
The diagnostic exploration of a chemically injured patient is a new field, which is difficult for the inexperienced physician. Chemically injured patients often complain of impaired cognitive and memory functions, intermittent confusion and disorientation, changes in behavior and mood, word-finding problems, sleep disorders, decreased libido and potency. At times they complain of seizure-like events. They also often report recurrent flu-like symptoms, fatigue and exhaustion, malaise, headaches, and chronic pain. Skin rashes, gastrointestinal complaints, and other health effects may also be present. Different patients may react differently to a given chemical or group of chemicals.
Toxic effects cannot be objectively evaluated unless every involved system is studied with advanced and sophisticated methodology. Without benefit of that process, a chemically injured patient will be dismissed with a diagnosis of post- traumatic stress disorder, somatization disorder or other labels implying that "it's all in their heads" [Davidoff, et al., 2000]. The largest patient population to have received such a diagnosis is that of the Persian Gulf War Veterans. As of the writing of this article, nine years after the armed conflict, several hundred thousand veterans still suffer from a host of symptoms called "Persian Gulf War Illness" which may in large part be due to chemic