top
Environmental
Health
Network

EHN
P.O. Box 1155
Larkspur, California, 94977

Support and Information Line
(SAIL) 415.541.5075
A 501 (c) (3) non profit agency
We all are stakeholders when it comes to breathing.©



Stuff Happens!

Hateful-Hurtfuls
Unprovoked "hateful-hurtfuls" do happen! The fragrance-users attack the fragrance-sensitized individual, in school, in the workplace, even in places of worship. Heavens! Bullies abound . . . and considering the serious adverse events associated with fragrance sensitization, I personally consider such attacks hate crimes.

Like MCS, the Hateful-Hurtfuls are not all just in our minds. Read the STUFF linked to from this page to learn the damning and damaging words and works used by people in power against those of us living with chemical injury. We must know what we are up against as we try to gain access to work, education, health care, transportation, services,... LIFE.

Perpetraters of the Hateful-Hurtfuls, a euphemism for ASSAULT and DISCRIMINATION, and our executives of our various, recently notorious self-regulated industries, should study The Guy in the Glass.

The Guy In the Glass
by Dale Wimbrow, (c) 1934
http://users.lmi.net/wilworks/ehnlinx/guyglass.htm

To learn of useful information to help you gain access and accommodation, please visit EHN's Take Heart! -- barb

REMEMBER: Write Now!

20/20 | AAFP | ACAAI | ACSH | Am.Family Physician

"Apples" | Assaulted by Fragrances | ATSDR Report

John Balzar | Stephen Barrett

Candles | CEI | CFIS | CMA | DigiScents

Edell on MCS | EI Doctors | EI Briefing Paper | ESRI

FDA | FOX News | Fragrance Use Tips | Fragrant Door | 'Fumed! | Fumento, Michael

Global Climate Coalition | Ronald Gots | GWS | Gypsy Moths | HealthWatcher | Dave Hitt

ICTM | Industry Offensive in Halifax | JUNK | Dr Koop | LA Times | The Lexington Institute

MCS: A clinical Perspective | Leah McLaren | MHN | Steven Milloy | NCAHF | NEJM | NIOSH

OSHA | Dr. Loren Pankratz | Perfume 2000 Magazine | Pest Control Operators | Pesticide Coalition

Pesticide Scented | Precautionary | Psychogenic | QuackWatch - S Barrett

Reason | SafetyAlerts | Skepticism.Net | Somatic | SPEIAC | John Stossel

Abba Terr, MD | Jesse Ventura Air "Freshener" |Virtual Aroma Dr. Miles Weinberger


Dear Visitors:
I'm all for truly sound science and certainly integrity in science. How I wish it were
there in the industries producing our consumer products and releasing them to market
without genuinely substatiating safety! Unfortunately, those who doth protest too much,
me thinks (to paraphrase the Bard), wouldn't know science -- 'sound science,' or the
'integrity of science,' etc. -- if it came up and bit them in the back side.
----

Articles may no longer be available but in most cases, you do have titles, authors and dates so
you can pursue the subject on your own, should you care too. Many organizations have articles
up on the web for a few weeks and then make them available for a charge. -- barb


  • American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP)
    The following article and editorial appeared in the Sept. 1, 1998 issue of the American
    Family Physician
    journal. Such notables as Ronald Gots and Stephen Barrett with the
    title of doctor, are quoted as giving the "truth" about chemical injury. Indeed. They are simply
    proclaiming the chemical industry mantra. See Environmental Illness Briefing Paper, the 1990 industry call-to-arms.

    AAFP, for shame!

    Just because there has not been evidence of even adequate testing before marketing of commonly
    used synthetic chemical products, including our ubiquitous fragrances, doesn't mean that
    they don't have the capability of causing problems to the respiratory system, the brain and
    nervous systems . . .

    Synthetic fragrances contain known and suspected carcinogens, teratogens and neurotoxins.
    Where are the studies for their possible role in rising rates of central nervous system diseases like
    Parkinson's and Alzheimer's; for the skyrocketing rates in asthma, in autism, in ADD?
    Where are the studies for the possible role played in the high rates of reproductive and fetal
    development problems by these products that are concoctions of petrochemicals? Where are the
    studies of fragrances as a possible link to escalating cancer rates? And, considering just
    the fragrance chemicals as irritants and sensitizers, where are the studies regarding indoor
    air pollution and its effect upon soaring "UNEXPLAINED" asthma rates for people of all ages,
    especially kids, Hispanics, African Americans, and our elderly? (Kids, Hispanics and African Americans are targeted by the industry for sales; our elderly are subjected to these toxic
    pollutants in hospitals, skilled nursing facilities and nursing homes. Heavy reliance upon
    synthetic scents does not mean the environment is clean, it is even more polluted by the
    flagrant use of fragrances.

    The industry's lack of adequate testing, and the lack of regulation by the government agencies
    charged with protecting public health, does not mean the already chemically injured are
    psychosomatic. I think it is high time to listen to the already chemically injured. By ignoring
    us and or stultifying us for years, we've only seen our numbers escalate. That is NOT indiciative
    of "mass hysteria," but it may well be viewed as a dereliction of duty by those in regulatory
    positions. It is high time to put behind you, the "Never Measure, Never Manage" philosophy.

    AAFP, by publishing such a biased article you are doing a disservice to the public -- both those
    who are already living with the effects of adverse events due to chemial poisonings by
    commonly used consumer products and to those who do not yet recognize the cause of their
    often insidious diseases and illnesses. Remember, one does not have to be the primary user
    to be adversely affected by these toxic products with their volatile organic compounds, which
    are recognized air and water pollutants. For more iformation on the toxins found in scents, see
    FDA Petition. -- barb


    • Editorial: Multiple Chemical Sensitivity
      ROY L. DEHART, M.D., M.P.H.
      University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
      "... There is activist litigation against manufacturers of carpet, paint, household cleaning
      products, etc. These multimillion dollar lawsuits have been curtailed by the 1993
      U.S. Supreme Court decision, Daubert versus Merrell Dow, which has given trial judges
      authority to exclude unscientific testimony.9 This decision has been used successfully
      in ruling that multiple chemical sensitivity is not a recognized clinical entity. However,
      this ruling does not exclude the possibility that the constellation of symptoms will
      reappear under another name. ..."
      What mainstream medical doctor receives adequate hours of training in recognizing and
      diagnosing illnesses clearly associated with modern toxic products, like pesticides? Another
      regurgitation of the chemical industry's call-to-arms, their 1990 EI Briefing Paper. -- barb

      http://www.aafp.org/afp/980901ap/edit.html

    • Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Syndrome
      MICHAEL K. MAGILL, M.D., and ANTHONY SURUDA, M.D., M.P.H.
      University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
      http://www.aafp.org/afp/980901ap/magill.html


  • Actions against EI doctors
    You all better start thinking this is serious, because it is! If you can contribute to the medical
    defense funds of these doctors, please do so. If there is such a fund, that info will be available
    through the links given below.

    Also, do read The Chemical Manufacturers Association's 1990 Environmental Illness
    Briefing Paper.
    It is available in the BEST of the Reactor, 1985 - 1995, and online at
    http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/books/cmaeibri.htm

    Seems to me, this paper, this call to arms, set the stage for actions taken against EI doctors and us,
    the already chemically injured. -- barb




  • The American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI)
    http://www.acaai.org/

      NOTE: ACAAI's Life Quality test leaves out any reference to fragrances. However,
      it does ask if when you do simple chores, do you have trouble breathing or do you cough?
      And under "Triggers," it does state: "My asthma gets worse and worse when I'm
      around tobacco smoke, fumes or strong odors.

      But, how many people use fragrance products for "simple chores" and never figure out
      it's the fragrances that make them have trouble breathing or that cause their
      cough ... or gives them headaches, or rhinitis or ?And how many people really
      associate fragrance products with "fumes or strong odors" -- or a better question:
      How many doctors associate "fumes or strong odors" with the ubiquitous fragrances
      in personal care and cleaning/maintenance products?

      Another complaint of mine ... and I did write .... is that their idea of "accessible
      locations" is a far cry from reality. By screening as they are, they automatically
      eliminate a large body of people who are already chemically sensitive and have
      enough sense to avoid public places such as malls, civic centers, health fairs and
      even places of worship. Please inform ACAAI that malls, health fairs, stores, even
      doctors offices and churches are not "accessible locations" for those of us who are
      already living with chemical-induced asthma. -- barb


        "Nationwide Asthma Screenings Help Americans Breathe Easier"
        "Free asthma screenings will be performed at shopping malls, civic centers,
        health fairs and other accessible locations throughout the country. During a
        screening, adults who are experiencing breathing problems complete a
        20-question Life Quality (LQ) Test developed by ACAAI for the program."
        http://allergy.mcg.edu/lifequality/nasp.html

        Life Quality Test
        "If you or your child has been told you have asthma, or even if you have
        occasional problems taking a good, deep breath, this simple test from the
        American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI) may help
        improve your LIFE QUALITY (or "LQ"). Just answer these 20 questions
        and decide whether a quick, free phone call could lead to a better LQ for
        you."
        http://allergy.mcg.edu/lifequality/index.html

        The Kids' Asthma Check
        In the kids' check list, they again refer to "strong odors," but how many kids or
        their parents would think of even mild fragrance and pesticide odors as being
        capable of causing or triggering asthma, and yet they can! -- barb

        http://allergy.mcg.edu/lifequality/kac2.html or http://allergy.mcg.edu/lifequality/kac1.html

        But look, there is hope! ACAAI recognizes that fragrances in personal care
        and cleaning/maintenance products can and do cause rhinitis. See their "public website," Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Online. This info is also where it really belongs, on EHN's The Word IS Out! -- barb

      • Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Online
        http://allergy.mcg.edu/

        • "What triggers vasomotor rhinitis?
          "Irritants that can trigger vasomotor rhinitis include cigarette smoke, strong odors and
          fumes including perfume, hair spray, other cosmetics, laundry detergents, cleaning
          solutions, ... "
          http://allergy.mcg.edu/Advice/rhin.html


  • American Council on Science and Health (ACSH)
    ACSH stories appear throughout ... use your browser's find command and key in ACSH -- barb
  • American Family Physician; Dec 15, 2000
    Mass Psychogenic Illness: Role of the Individual Physician.
    Author/s: Timothy F. Jones,M.D.,"... is a medical epidemiologist with the Tennessee
    Department of Health and assistant clinical professor of preventive medicine at
    Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville. ..."
    http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m3225/12_62/67940114/print.jhtml

  • American Medical News
    "Doctors debate 'chemical sensitivity' diagnosis"
    http://www.ama-assn.org/sci-pubs/amnews/pick_99/hlta0809.htm

  • Apple Scented Products
    • Apples for Health
      Enhance Your Work Day
      They recommend:
        "Enhance Your Work Day
        "Keep a bottle of your favorite fragrance on hand when you need a boost of
        confidence. Fragrance has been shown to elevate your mood. Pleasant
        fragrances can contribute to office harmony, even allowing for a more friendly
        resolution to situations of conflict.

        "Cure those Monday morning blues with a spritz of a lemon scent. When you
        find yourself in an afternoon slump, spray a peppermint or citrus scent into the
        air or into your palms and perk up those sluggish brain cells.

        "Losing focus during sustained tasks such as data entry or proof-reading? Get
        a quick fix with a whiff of peppermint. When the stress of deadlines and
        projects catches up to you, try relaxing with the scents of vanilla or lavender. "

      No wonder they are concerned with people "[l]osing focus," synthetic scents are neurotoxins.
      Folks, FIRST check with your colleagues and if it is OK with them, use a mint sprig
      or a cutting of lavender, if you need a scent boost. Keep it truly personal. Also, leave the toxic
      synthetic fragrances for your own home, if you need to use them at all. Why not write to
      Apples for Health to educate them about the petrochemicals they are touting?-- barb

      http://www.applesforhealth.com/enhance1.html

    • Apple-scented Phone Books
      • Apple-scented phone books
        CNN.com/US; Tuesday, January 7, 2003 Posted: 5:23 PM EST (2223 GMT)
        " WENATCHEE, Washington (AP) -- That sweet smell in Wenatchee might
        have been kicked up by someone who let his fingers do the walking.

        "The 2003 phone books distributed by Hagadone Directories in north-central
        Washington are scented with an apple fragrance. ..."
        http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/West/01/07/offbeat.phonebook.ap/

      • Townsfolk smell agriculture on their phone books
        Associated Press ... "... Jim Hail, co-owner and president of Coeur d'Alene, Idaho-based
        Hagadone Directories, said he came up with the scented phone book
        idea as a way to mark the company's decade-long presence in the area.

        'When we initially talked about it, my staff rolled their eyes,' Hail said.
        'Now we're talking about utilizing it in other markets.' ..."
        http://www.startribune.com/stories/1451/3576627.html

    ATSDR
  • Predecisional Draft Report on MCS
    http://www.health.gov/environment/mcs/index.htm

    • OSHA -Spring 2000 -- OSHA, in its infinite wisdom (yes, do read sarcasim) links to this report as well as chemical industry fronts and apologists:
      Statement of The Interagency Workgroup on Multiple Chemical Sensitivity
      November 2000
      http://www.health.gov/environment/mcs/letter.htm

      Spring 2001 -- Comments are posted. Do you get to see all of the public comments? NO.
      They summarize our comments but they publish this biased document in whole.
      Most MCS groups and activists have soundly renounced the ATSDR report for a variety of valid
      reasons. For a look at a few of the public comments, in their entirety, visit EHN's page
      Responses to the MCS Report
      http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/atsdr/atsdrmcs.htm#Rebuttals

      April 2003, until ?:
      Well, OSHA got rid of its duplicitous statement:
      "Control: Because the cause of MCS is not currently known, control methods could only
      be
      based on unproven theories. MCS is clearly not occupationally related. "
      Whatever else I feel is right or wrong with OSHA's new page on MCS, their first reference
      under "Other" is to a chemical front organization developed by Ronald Gots MD -- "Environmental
      Sensitivities Research Institute." But they top themselves by also referencing, "'Clinical
      Ecology - A Critical Appraisal.' California Medical Association Scientific Board Task Force on
      Clinical Ecology. (1986). Western Journal of Medicine 144:239-245." As Albert Donnay of
      MCS Referral and Resources informs us: "California Medical Association, which adopted a
      position paper critical of clinical ecology in 1986, reclassified it as a "historical document only" in
      1993." In other words, folks, OSHA seems to be misinforming employers and employees by
      virtue of its reference links. Just what is OSHA trying to do here?
      http://www.mcsrr.org/factsheets/mcsrecog.html.

      I suggest to OSHA that they begin studying sites like EHN's, JAN, MCS R&R, Alison Johnson's,
      Fragranced Products Information Network, contact Mary Lamielle . . ., visit ECHO
      . . . heck, just go to EHN's page of MCS Links
      http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnlinx/mcs.htm
      And, OSHA may want to follow out one of its links to the link of links, which eventually leads to
      Allergies: Culprit Could be in Cosmetic Bag
      http://www.newswise.com/articles/2000/3/ALLERGY.AAD.html

      Get superfluous fragrance products -- remember that includes pesticides! -- out of the workplace
      and you'll improve indoor air AND health! THAT is worker safety, OSHA, and it ties in
      beautifully with the concept of Illness and Injury Prevention programs! -- barb

    John Balzar
    Columnist for the Los Angeles Times
    "Busybodies, Inc.: Really, it's for a good cause"
    Another article with fragrance industry bias well in place. I am the last to know about Marin
    County resturants -- good thing Mr. Balzar informed us through his: "California's Marin
    County, of course, has signed up to require perfume and non-perfume seating in restaurants.

    An airline can go "peanut-free" because peanuts used by another could make one person
    violently ill, yet people requiring fragrance-free accommodation in public venues -- including
    on airliners -- are ready targets for ridicule and denigration. Lovely.-- barb

    http://www.jsonline.com/news/editorials/jun01/balzar_03060201.asp



  • Candles

  • Chemical Manufacturers Association - CMA

  • Chirobase and QuackWatch (Stephen Barrett, M.D.)
    Also below under QuackWatch. -- barb
    http://www.quackwatch.com/index.html

    • Chirobase
      "A Skeptical Guide to Chiropractic History, Theories, and Current Practices"
      Operated by Stephen Barrett, M.D.; William T. Jarvis, Ph.D.; Charles E. DuVall Jr., D.C.
      http://www.chirobase.org/index.html

    • Competitive Enterprise Institute - CEI
      http://www.cei.org/

        About CEI
        "The Competitive Enterprise Institute is a non-profit public policy
        organization dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and
        limited government. We believe that consumers are best helped not
        by government regulation but by being allowed to make their own
        choices in a free marketplace."

        And where their last sentence falls apart is that we are not allowed to make
        INFORMED choices as there is little truth in advertising. When it comes
        to the fragrance industry, it is UNregulated. Debilitating diseases associated
        with environmental illnesses have soared during these past decades with the proliferation
        of synthetic fragrances. Come on!

        To give you a glimpse at CEI, here are a couple of links to check out. -- barb

        http://www.cei.org/about.html

      • "More Sorry Than Safe"
        by Jonathan H. Adler
        http://www.cei.org/UpdateReader.asp?ID=844

      • Center for Private Conservation
        http://www.cei.org/cpc/index.html


    • The Council for Scientific Medicine


    • CFIS - Citizens for the Integrity of Science
      Multiple Chemical Sensitivity -- Mea Culpa (Page 1)
      If you want to see junk science, you've got it here. -- barb
      http://www.cfis.org/ubb/Forum8/HTML/000201.html

    • Dean Edell, MD




    • DigiScentsTM
      "DigiScentsÅis an interactive media company that enables lifelike
      and memorable experiences through the digitization and broadcast
      of scent."
      http://www.digiscents.com/



    • Environmental Illness Briefing Paper, 1990
      page 171, Best of the Reactor -- 1985 - 1995, edited by Susan Molloy
      http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/books/cmaeibri.htm

    • Environmental Sensitivities Research Institute (ESRI)
      Gots resigned and after the State Farm expose, a search of ESRI site turns up nothing on Gots. -- barb
      http://www.esri.org/

    • FDA - Oversight? Regulation?
      • FDA AUTHORITY OVER COSMETICS
        http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/cos-206.html

          The FDA does not regulate the fragrance industry,
          but worse, does not even follow the regulations already
          on its books to require warning labels on fragrances
          released to market without adequate testing. Take time
          to write to the FDA after learning about the toxic
          chemicals used to create synthetci scents (syn scents?)
          http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/FDApetition/bkgrinfo.htm -- barb

      • Ovarian Cancer and Talc Powder - A Sixty-Year Scandal of Informed Neglect
        http://www.monitor.net/ovarian/talc.html

      • The Virus and the Vaccine
        A simian virus known as SV40 has been associated with a number of rare
        human cancers. This same virus contaminated the polio vaccine administered to
        98 million Americans from 1955 to 1963. Federal health officials see little reason for
        concern. A growing cadre of medical researchers disagree
        by Debbie Bookchin and Jim Schumacher; The Atlantic Monthly; February 2000
        http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2000/02/002bookchin.htm

    • FOX News
      Have you ever wondered why your local Fox News team ignore your attempt to share
      information on chemical poisoning via commonly used modern consumer products? Well, no
      need to continue to wonder ... FOX touts Steven Milloy'sJunkScience under Science
      and if that ain't JUNK journalism, I don't knw what is! If you feel as strongly as I do, please write to FOX News at:
      comments@newsdigital.com-- barb

    • Fragrance Use Tips
        "Everyone has a personal 'scent circle': approximately an arm's length from the
        body. No one should be aware of your fragrance unless he or she steps inside your
        "circle." Fragrance should be one of the most subtle, personal messages you send to
        those with whom you come in contact."

        http://www.fragrance.org/feature_tip_content.html


      First, is anyone granted an "arm's length" of space in a theater? In some restaurants? In a
      medical facility? In school? At work? On jury duty?

      But, given that the industry is suggesting people refrain from loading up on fragrances, they are
      giving a mixed message ... at best. The tips go on to tell people to "layer" scents and to apply
      them throughout the day. Layering scents and applying throughout the day makes it virtually
      impossible to have a "scent circle" that only extends "approximately an arm's length from the
      body." That is topped by the vact that we are dealing with volatile organic compounds, whose
      very nature is to become one with the air we all breath . . . it's the very nature of the beast!

      Lest you think I'm kidding, from their Fragrance Dos and Don'ts page:

        " DO ...use fragrance throughout every day. It will increase your feelings of well
        being...add a special degree of graciousness to daily living...make life for
        you and those around you infinitely more pleasurable and enjoyable."
        http://www.fragrance.org/dodont.html


      No wonder the chemically sensitive are driven from gainful employment, from education, from
      enjoying the theater, opera, movies, a dinner out. . .from HEALTH CARE. And folks, these
      are toxic chemicals that in 1986 were identified by the National Academy of Science among
      other chemicals to be tested for neurotoxicty. We are still waiting. The industry is still
      unregulated and does not have to disclose any information as it is protected by trade secret laws.
      And the US FDA does not require warning labels for fragrances released to market without
      adequate testing, despite the fact that such a regulation already exists on its books.

      What can you, the consumer do?

      1. Write to the FDA about your adverse reactions to synthetic fragrances.
        See "FDA Petition for full contact information and analyses of six popular scents.
        http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/FDApetition/bkgrinfo.htm

      2. Ask your representative to support a bill introduced by Rep. Jan Schakowsky (IL), and
        co-sponsored by Rep. Shelley Berkley (NV): HR 5238. The Safe Notification
        and Information for Fragrances Act has been referred to the House Subcommittee on
        Health and Environment. Go into Thomas, key in hr 5238, clidk the search button
        and up will pop the information. An alternative is to key in the word "fragrance" in the right box
        and click search. "Fragrance" will bring up:
          1 . Safe Notification and Information for Fragrances Act
          (Introduced in the House)[H.R.5238.IH]
          2 . Tampon Safety and Research Act of 1999 (Introduced in the House)[H.R.890.IH]
        http://thomas.loc.gov/home/thomas.html
      -- barb


    • Questionnaire & Answer Guide



  • 'Fumed!




  • Fumento, Michael (see bio at page bottom - barb)
    http://www.fumento.com/

    Also see Reason, below. -- barb
    • Articles by Michael Fumento
      http://www.consumeralert.org/fumento/index.htm
        Thoughts from barb: Notice the newspoapers that carry Michael Fumento. How
        many of those same newspapers have carried any of the truthful information from/about
        those of us who are now living with chemical injury?

        But I have an even larger question: How many of our nation's newspapers -- or TV media -- have
        carried any of the truthful information about the many preventable Environmental Illnesses?
        I also wonder: How many have carried the information regarding EHN's petition currently
        before the FDA to declare "misbranded" (the FDA's term) fragrances released to market
        without adequatge testing? Have any given full FDA contact information?

        Unless the media provides the full, factual information, millions who are adversely affected by
        fragrances have not a clue that they can write to the FDA requesting that, at a minimum, the FDA
        follow its own regulations already on the books. See FDA Petition
        at http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/FDApetition/bkgrinfo.htm

        Our numbers of ill continue to soar -- whether we live with ADD, MCS, GWS, SBS, Asthma,
        Migraines, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Lupus, Chronic Fatigue, Parkinson's ... Cancers. We all
        live with Environmental Illness. The medical industry continues to be flummoxed. We continue
        to read words of medical industry representatives to the effect: "We just don't understand
        these findings." . . . "We need more research." In the meantime, more people of all ages, races,
        worldwide, become chemically injured with a variety of symptoms. "Diversity" applies to
        illnesses and disabilities also.

        I believe our numbers continue to climb because the truth about the toxicity of commonly
        used -- highlly advertised -- consumer products adversely affects the research grant and
        advertising coffers of the medical and media industries. But, that is coupled with the huge profits
        of the chemical pharmaceutical industry -- they sell products that keep folks functioning
        for a time. Iatrogenic illnesses and deaths soar, while media coffers are filled with advertising
        dollars from commonly used consumer products and the drugs used to feel a little better.

        It's the ECONOMY, folks.

        But, where is the cure? We find it is in avoiding, to the extent possible, the superfluous toxins
        in our consumer products. And that leads to demands for access and accommodation. To learn
        of those gains, do visit EHN's page, Take Heart! at http://www.ehnca.org/ehnhompg/takheart.htm -- barb



    • Another Gulf War Syndrome Fad/Theory Fails the Test
      by Michael Fumento; March 20, 1997
      http://www.consumeralert.org/fumento/gulffad.htm

        Appropriately released for April Fools Day by American Specator; April 2000 --
        Scents And SENSELESSNESS

      • Scents and Senselessness
        By Michael Fumento>
        "The American Spectator, April 2000; Copyright 2000 by The American Spectator
        "The Anti-Fragrance Movement has its nose out of joint ‚ and sweet-smelling Canada is leading the way. ... "
        http://www.fumento.com/scents.html

          Fumento and company's articles are available online through Fumento's site.

          If these spin-off stories don't prove that errors compound, I don't know what does. Part of the
          flawed premiss begins with the fallacious and relatively recent article in the New England
          Journal of Medicine.
          See http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnhompg/stufhaps.htm#New
          to link out to NEJM's abstract and spinoff stories. But, the damning and damaging to the MCS
          community "stuff" began a decade ago when the Chemical Manufacturers Association published
          their Environmental Illness Briefing Paper -http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/books/cmaeibri.htm
          See for yourself. -- barb


        • Senselessness About Scents or
          A Wilkie by any other spelling ...

          A response to the Fumento article, by barb wilkie
          http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnhompg/wilke.htm


        • Another Fumento Spin-off article in
          Perfume 2000 Magazine
          "From A Perfumer's Point Of View"
          by Jean-Pierre Subrenat
          "It's 6:30 pm and this older lady (she just turned 84 years old the week before) is
          putting the finishing touches to her attire. Tonight she is going to City Hall for the
          monthly Council meeting. She is always looking forward to these monthly dates with
          her fellow citizens of the Nova Scotia Maritime capital: Halifax. ..."
          Proving errors compound, get a load of this line! And it's about this big as a pull quote, too.
          Of course, the errors by Fumento were picked up and repeated . . . but they kept the essence.
          I can be adversely affected by fragrances on people a block away, just as I can also be adversely
          affected by fabric softeners used Goodness only knows where in the neighborhood. Where, oh
          where, is adherence to that industry prescribed "scent circle" when you need it? -- barb

            "Fragrance products worn by people a block
            away, adversely affect the chemically sensitive,"
            claims Marin County's Barb Wilke.
          http://www.perfume2000.com/magazine/Sep2000/magazine5.asp

          Note: For the TRUTH about that woman in Halifax, see EHN's section on the conference
          http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnlinx/aaprbb.htm


            Two bits' worth by barb: Frankly, I'm getting a little tired of the duplicity of these
            articles which besmirch my escutcheon -- and dishonor the reputations of other activists.
            We dedicate our lives and our limited personal money to bringing the truth to the public.
            The REAL truth, which too often is untold by mainstream western medicine, mainstream
            media, our government agencies -- agencies charged with PROTECTING public health, not
            industry. There are more than 70,000 chemicals in commerce today. And too many of those
            chemicals are out there polluting our air, land and water and the industry and the government
            and medical "science" know far too little about the consequences. Suffered by people of all
            ages in ruined health or premature death, suffered by their pets, suffered by the fish and wildlife
            downstream, suffered, indeed, by our planet Earth. Let's give some thought to PREVENTION. -- barb

      • Environmentalists, Activists, Doomsayers and Other Alarmists
        The one article I've read by Fumento is the one in which he butchered facts right and left --
        Senselessness About Scents, above, proving he suffers from senselessness about scents. -- barb

        http://fumento.com/suenviron.html

      • Gulf Lore Syndrome
        "Why are the Gulf War vets getting sick? You won't find out by reading The New York Times and USA Today. "
        By Michael Fumento; Reason, March 1997; Copyright 1997 by Reason magazine
        http://overlawyered.com/articles/fumento/gulflore.html

      • The (Irrational) Fear of Pesticides
        http://fumento.com/supest.html

      • New Syndrome? Or More Silliness?
        By Michael Fumento
        Copyright 1996 by Michael Fumento
        http://www.fumento.com/bomis11.html

      • Pesticides Are Not The Problem
        By Michael Fumento; Science adviser to the Atlantic Foundation
        and author of Science Under Siege
        http://web.utk.edu/~gwilson1/fumento.html



      • Reason Online
        SICK OF IT ALL - People with "Multiple Chemical sensitivity" are definitely
        suffering. The question is, why?

        By Michael Fumento
        (The answer is: CHEMICALS ... 70,000 or so in the economy today. So much is unkown
        about them used singly and less about them used in combination and still less about the effects of
        them together as the volatilize to make new compounds ...

        What is known is that among the 3,000-5,000 petrochemicals used to formulate synthetic scents,
        you'll find irritants and sensitizers -- HELLO, ASTHMA! -- and you'll also find known or
        suspected carcinogens, neurotoxins (adversely affecting your brain, your central nervous system)
        and teratogens (adversely affecting embryonic and fetal development). But you'll not get that
        info from Mr. Fumento. -- barb)

        http://www.reasonmag.com/9606/Fe.FUMENTO.html

      • Senseless Scent Patrol
        By Michael Fumento
        The Washington Times, May 7, 2000
        Copyright 2000 by The Washington Times
        http://www.fumento.com/washtimesscent.html

      • With Gulf War Syndrome, No Disease Is No News
        By Michael Fumento; January 7, 2000
        http://www.fumento.com/gulfstudies.html



    • Functional Somatic Syndromes
      Annals of Internal Medicine, 1 June 1999. 130:910-921
      Arthur J. Barsky, MD, and Jonathan F. Borus, MD
      http://www.acponline.org/journals/annals/01jun99/barsky.htm

    • Global Climate Coalition.
      "A voice for business in the global warming debate"
      Note, check out EWG on The Word IS Out! -- barb
      http://www.globalclimate.org/

    • Ronald Gots, MD, PhD
      Also see EHN's The Word IS Out! -- use your browser's FIND command
      http://users.lmi.net/wilworks/ehnhompg/wordout.htm

    • International Center for Toxicology and Medicine
      "ICTM provides impartial medical and scientific evaluation
      services. Our in-house team of professionals specialize in
      environmental and occupational medicine, toxicology,
      industrial hygiene, and physical sciences.
      They said it, not me, but I sure question their impartiality . . . -- barb

        "Recent ICTM projects include:
        Indoor Air/ Sick Building Syndrome
        Occupational Toxic Exposure
        Accidental Release of Chemicals into the
        Environment
        Adverse Drug Reactions
        Health and Ecological Risk Assessment
        Risk Communication

        "Recent clients include:
        Legal Profession
        Chemical Manufacturers
        Pharmaceutical Companies
        Insurance and Financial Firms
        Trade Associations
        Environmental Organizations
        US Federal, State, and Local Governments
        International Governments"
      http://www.ictm.com/home.html

    • Multiple Chemical Sensitivities: Distinguishing between Psychogenic and Toxicodynamic
      by Ronald E. Gots, M.D., Ph.D.
      http://ictm.com/articles/ICTM103.html

    • Multiple Chemical Sensitivities‚ Public Policy
      by Ronald E. Gots, M.D., Ph.D.
      http://ictm.com/articles/ICTM134.html

    • National Medical Advisory Service, Bethesda, Maryland.

      • Texaco and Ecuador Information Package - Response To Claims
        "Dr. Ronald E. Gots, M.D., Ph.D. of the National Medical Advisory Service in
        Bethesda, Maryland, wrote, "As a meaningful discussion of differences in disease or
        health outcome prevalences it (the UPPSAE study) has no scientific merit. As an
        epidemiological investigation of the effects of oil petrochemicals upon health it is of no
        value at all."
        http://www.texaco.com/shared/position/docs/responsec.html


    • Workers Comp: The real QUACKS!
      http://www.injuredworker.org/forums/injuredworker/posts/1078.html

  • Gulf War Syndrome
  • Industry on offense in Halifax
    The industry on the offense is as offensive as the toxic chemicals used in their fragrances.

    Also see EHN's page A, Articles on Halifax, which includes gems like,
    "No-Scent Makes Good Sense" -- barb

    http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnlinx/a.htm#Halifax

  • Iowa professor: Dr. Miles Weinberger, a professor of pediatrics at the University of Iowa
    (You have just GOT to read this! A snippet ... Read the whole article, then write. -- barb)

    "[Dr. Weinberger] wonders if the senators have been misguided by anti-pesticide activists.
    "If they are using pesticides, their purpose is to eliminate roaches and flies and other
    insects that are unpleasant and have potential to transmit diseases themselves," said
    Weinberger. He noted that in older schools, particularly in the Northeast, "roaches
    may contribute to allergies -- so any safe measure that kills them would enhance the safety
    of the school, rather than create harm."
    http://www.drkoop.com/news/focus/october/sepa.html
    email to: miles-weinberger@uiowa.edu

  • International Center for Toxicology and Medicine (ICTM)
    http://ictm.com/main.html

  • Dr. Koop.com
  • LA Times Friday, January 28, 2000 - available online limited time, then by fee
    "The Significance of the 21st Century Schnoz "
    By GREG MORAGO, Hartford Courant
    http://www.calendarlive.com/fashion/20000127/t000008724.html

    Mental Help Net (MHN)
    • UNDERSTANDING MULTIPLE CHEMICAL SENSITIVITY (MCS)
      In my opinion, there is NO understanding MCS in this opinion piece, in which the editor has
      the temerity to send one on to a Michael Fumento article appearing in REASON. There we
      learn "Michael Fumento is REASON's science correspondent, under a grant from the
      William H. Donner Foundation." -- barb

      http://mentalhelp.net/archives/editor7.htm


  • Steven Milloy - JUNK
  • Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Syndrome: A Clinical Perspective. II. Evaluation,
    Diagnostic Testing, Treatment, and Social Considerations
    - Abstract
    Authors: Sparks-PJ; Daniell-W; Black-DW; Kipen-HM; Altman-LC; Simon-GE; Terr-AI
    Source: Journal of Occupational Medicine, Vol. 36, No. 7, pages 731-737.
    http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/8pmcsab-3.html

  • The National Council Against Health Fraud
    http://www.hcrc.org/ncahf/ncahf.html
  • National Post Online, Canada
  • New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM)
    http://www.nejm.org



  • NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health)
    Call 1-800-35-NIOSH (1-800-356-4674) for additional information
    Read their abstracts. Then contact NIOSH! -- barb
    http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/8pmcspg.html?

  • OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration)
    • Multiple Chemical Sensitivities - written well before April 2003
      "Because the cause of MCS is not currently known, control methods could only be
      based on unproven theories. MCS is clearly not occupationally related."

      If YOU are as outraged by this report in general -- and specifically by the line above -- as I am,
      please call and/or write OSHA. Heavens, they've even linked to that predecisional draft ATSDR-
      released report, which contained the words of industry apologists such as doctors Ronald Gots
      (chemical front organizations) and Abba Terr (Workers' Comp).

      Furthermore, how can OSHA state on one hand that the cause of MCS is NOT known, and then
      state CATEGORICALLY on the other that "MCS is clearly not occupationally related"?
      That's HOGWASH! -- barb

      http://www.osha-slc.gov/SLTC/multiplechemicalsensitivities/index.html

    • OSHA -Spring 2000 -- OSHA, in its infinite wisdom links to this report:
      Statement of The Interagency Workgroup on Multiple Chemical Sensitivity
      November 2000
      http://www.health.gov/environment/mcs/letter.htm

        Spring 2001 -- Comments are posted. Do you get to see all of the public comments? NO.
        They summarize our comments but they publish this biased document in whole.
        Most MCS groups and activists have soundly renounced the ATSDR report for a variety of valid
        reasons. For a look at a few of the public comments, in their entirety, visit EHN's page
        Responses to the MCS Report
        http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/atsdr/atsdrmcs.htm#Rebuttals

      April 2003, until ?:
      Well, OSHA got rid of their duplicitous statement:
      "Control: Because the cause of MCS is not currently known, control methods could only
      be
      based on unproven theories. MCS is clearly not occupationally related. "
      Whatever else is right or wrong with OSHA's revised page on MCS, their first reference under
      "Other" is to a chemical front organization developed by Dr. Ronald Gots . . ."Environmental
      Sensitivities Research Institute." But they top themselves by also referencing, "'Clinical
      Ecology - A Critical Appraisal.' California Medical Association Scientific Board Task Force on
      Clinical Ecology. (1986). Western Journal of Medicine 144:239-245." As Albert Donnay of
      MCS Referral and Resources informs us: "California Medical Association, which adopted a
      position paper critical of clinical ecology in 1986, reclassified it as a "historical document only" in
      1993" http://www.mcsrr.org/factsheets/mcsrecog.html.

      I suggest to OSHA that they begin studying sites like EHN's, MCS R&R, Alison Johnson's,
      contact Mary Lamielle . . . ECHO . . . heck, just go to EHN's page of MCS Links
      http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnlinx/mcs.htm
      And, OSHA may want to follow out one of its links and the link of links to
      Allergies: Culprit Could be in Cosmetic Bag
      http://www.newswise.com/articles/2000/3/ALLERGY.AAD.html

      Get fragrance products out of the workplace and you'll improve indoor air AND health! THAT is worker safety, OSHA. -- barb

    Dr. Loren Pankratz
    Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon
    Multiple Chemical Sensitivity and Dancing Manias
    A talk by Dr. Loren Pankratz, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon.
    http://www.psg.com/~ted/bcskeptics/meetings/Mt990929.html

    Perfume 2000 Magazine


  • Pest Control Operators of California
    Beyond Pesticides Daily News
    Once out to Beyobnd Pesticides, use your find command to locate: Fairfax, California
    Ordinance Disputed by Pest Control Operators of California (from April 19,2001). -- barb

    http://www.beyondpesticides.org/news.htm

  • Precautionary Principle
    Reason On Line
    "Michael Fumento is REASON's science correspondent, under a grant from the
    William H. Donner Foundation."
    http://www.reason.com/
    • Gulf Lore Syndrome Why are the Gulf War vets getting sick? You won't find out by reading
      The New York Times and USA Today.
      By Michael Fumento
      http://www.reason.com/9703/fe.fumento.html

    • Risky Journalism - April 1997
      ABC's John Stossel bucks a fearful establishment.
      Interviewed by Jacob Sullum
      " While preparing a 20/20 segment on multiple chemical sensitivity that aired in
      January, John Stossel sent ABC associate producer Deborah Ston . . ."
      http://www.reason.com/9704/fe.stosselint.html

      • LETTERS
        Includes response from Grace Ziem, M.D., written "...to correct misstatements and
        misimpressions presented by your interview with John Stossel ("Risky Journalism," April). -- barb

        Sensitivity Training
        http://www.reason.com/9710/letters.html

    • SICK OF IT ALL - June 1996
      People with "Multiple Chemical sensitivity" are definitely suffering. The question is, why?
      By Michael Fumento
      http://www.reason.com/9606/Fe.FUMENTO.html

      • Sensitive Reactions
        Includes excellent responses by William J. Meggs, M.D. and Cynthia Wilson, Executive
        Director, Chemical Injury Information AND Michael Fumento responding to them. -- barb

        http://www.reason.com/9610/ltr.fumento.html

    • Still Crazy
      Are federal judges taming the ADA? Don't count on it.
      By Walter Olson
      http://www.reason.com/9805/col.olson.html

  • SafetyAlerts' HealthScout
    • "Dust mites shoulder main blame for asthma rise in U.S."
      By Adam Marcus; HealthSCOUT Reporter
      http://www.healthscout.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Af?ap=55&id=90016
      "Some allergens believed to aggravate asthma might not be so irritating
      after all, the panelists found. These include pesticides, houseplants and
      perfumes. "There are a lot of things people have assumed are really bad
      actors, but the data are not that clear," says Johnston."
        (What was this reporter reading? I presonally think he -- and the industry --
      is making too much out of the dust mite.The IOM included "For biologic or chemical
      contaminants that could worsen asthma symptoms, limited or suggestive evidence exists
      regarding exposure to... fragrances in personal care and household products. See
      http://www4.nationalacademies.org/news.nsf/isbn/0309064961?OpenDocument -- barb)


  • San Francisco Chronicle
  • Scented Products Education and Information Association of Canada (SPEIAC)
    http://www.scentedproducts.on.ca/

  • SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER
    Locke orders spraying of gypsy moths
    Irate Ballard, Magnolia residents seek a
    court injunction to stop it

    Wednesday, May 10, 2000; By PHUONG LE and ANGELA GALLOWAY
    http://www.seattle-pi.com/local/moth10.shtml

  • Skepticism.Net
  • Abba Terr, MD
    • Chemical Warfare The world makes them sick, say a growing number of Floridians. The cause, they
      claim, is pesticides. But the pesticide industry says "prove it!"
      © Sun-Sentinel Company 1995
      Michael McLeod, Staff Writer; June 4, 1995
      "But to Stanford University immunologist Dr. Abba Terr, it's a kind of networked mass hysteria. As
      defined and presented by its proponents, chemical sensitivity constitutes a belief and not a disease, he
      says. If it is hypochondria, it has a high price, causing people to lose their jobs, their homes, their health,
      even their friends and relatives.
      http://www.sonic.net/~melissk/orlando1.html

    • CIIN - Chemical Injury Information Network
      http://www.ciin.org/library.htm

    • THE CHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION'S
      ENVIRONMENTAL ILLNESS BRIEFING PAPER, 1990

      http://lmi.net/wilworks/books/cmaeibri.htm

    • DSB Report: OVERVIEW
      Dr. Abba I. Terr, Stanford University Medical Center
      Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Persian Gulf War Health Effects
      http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/dsbrpt/overview.html

    • MCS: A Sensitive Issue
      http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/1994/102-9/focus1.html

    • Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Syndrome: A Clinical Perspective. II. Evaluation,
      Diagnostic Testing, Treatment, and Social Considerations
      - Abstract
      Authors: Sparks-PJ; Daniell-W; Black-DW; Kipen-HM; Altman-LC; Simon-GE; Terr-AI
      Source: Journal of Occupational Medicine, Vol. 36, No. 7, pages 731-737.
      http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/8pmcsab-3.html

    • POLITICS & NATURAL HEALTH
      What Biased Prosecutions Cost Skip Humphrey
      Leo B. Cashman
      Judge Astle did rely heavily on the testimony of Dr. Abba Terr, an allergist who had
      scientifically sparred with Sinaiko at scientific forums. To say that Dr. Terr competed with
      Sinaiko for the same patients may be an understatement; Terr practiced in the same
      building as Sinaiko. The judge dismissed any concern over allowing such a potentially
      biased witness or the fact that Dr. Terr makes up to $600 per hour as an expert witness
      on the defense (insurance industry) side against claims of allergy-caused
      disability.
      http://www.tcwellness.com/archives/1998wel/december/cost.html

    • Public Advocacy Initiatives of MCS Referral & Resources
      Complaints & Critiques- Advocating Scientific Integrity in MCS Research,
      MCS Conferences, and the U.S. Government's Response to Gulf War Syndrome
      http://www.mcsrr.org/advocacy.html

    • January 8, 1998: Dr. Abba Terr, a clinical teacher on allergy and immunology
      Includes defense notes:
        " [Note from Defense Brief:]
        " The "clear and convincing" evidence also shows that Abba Terr, M.D., the Board's lead consultant on MCS, should be disqualified as an expert for any part of the Accusations made against Dr. Sinaiko with any of these four patients. He has both personal and professional reasons for being unsuitable as a reviewer with this Respondent. Not only did he share very difficult high-profile cases (e.g., [E.T.]'s daughter) with Dr. Sinaiko -- with dramatically different outcomes -- but he also shared very difficult situations such as the police officer's death portrayed in the "Bad Chemistry" program aired on KQED and McNeil/Lehrer, again with dramatically different outcomes. Finally, Dr. Terr practiced and still practices in close proximity to Dr. Sinaiko and competes daily for allergy referrals and patients, a single objection that is more than adequate to cause him to be disqualified per the Board's published (Exhibit A -- April 1994) conflicts standards.

        "Dr. Terr has believed and published for decades that MCS is -- at best -- a psychiatric or psychosomatic illness. His dogma has not changed despite the world passing him by. Early on, many mainstream medical groups from the American Medical Association (AMA) to the California Medical Association (CMA) and the American College of Physicians (ACP) joined in Dr. Terr's bashing of "clinical ecologists" and their notions of environmentally-induced illness. All of these bodies had withdrawn their position papers on this subject by the early 1990's. One can only wonder how much the $600/hr consultancies to industry on MCS continue to color his view in 1998?"
      http://www.legalfund.org/Wit_hold.html#AT

    • Sweet-Scented Pesticide 'Sugarcoats a Toxic Pill' (bubblegum scent)
      "Critics Decry Industry's 'Perverse' Threat to Children" Andrew Duffy; The Ottawa Citizen - August 20, 2000
      http://www.corpwatch.org/trac/headlines/2000/294.html

    • Summary of Information Relevant to the Workers Compensation Appeals
      Tribunal (WCAT) test case of February 22, 2000

        "...- Dr. Staudenmayer's definition of environmental illness (pages 22-23) includes only
      part of what environmental medicine experts include. It includes only the higher dose,
      Toxicological part. He and Doctors Gots and Terr also appear unaware of years of
      research, hundreds of research papers that support the physiogenic nature of
      environmental illness/Sick Building Syndrome.

         "... Dr. Abba Terr, allergist and immunologist, testified to the lack of a connection between the immune system and EIS.....(p. 26) ...

         "... Chemical Exposures: Low Levels and high Stakes Second Edition.
      Nicholas Ashford and Claudia Miller (a few pages are included here, but this is a very
      important book to this WCB issue) It is recognized in this book that Dr. Gots,
      Dr. Staudenmayer, and Dr. Terr are three of the strongest proponents of the psychogenic
      theory in the United States. (Why is it that experts of equal weight from the
      physiogenic point of view were not brought in from the United States, England or
      elsewhere?) "
      http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/Education/CASLE/wcbinfo6.html

    • "Dr. Abba Terr is paid $600 an hour as the 'expert' to testify against patients who try
      to get insurance coverage for treatment of chemical/pesticide exposure. He also
      testifies against a physician who diagnoses such patients with anything other than a
      'somatoform disorder.' That¼s a fancy word for 'it¼s all in your head.' ..."

      TOWNSEND LETTER FOR DOCTORS & PATIENTS
      Robert Sinaiko, MD, Placed on Probation; January 2000
      http://www.mindspring.com/~adaughaus/Townsend_Letter.html

    • Workers Comp: The real QUACKS!
      http://www.injuredworker.org/forums/injuredworker/posts/1078.html



  • Jesse Ventura
    • A Breath of Fresh Air Officially Licensed Air Freshener
      "We are the ONLY authorized e-tailer for OTS Enterprises LLC."
      http://www.ibbuy.org/ventura/

    • OTS Enterprises, LLC presents: JESSE VENTURA - A Breath of Fresh Air
      Officially Licensed AIR FRESHENER
      AIN'T GOT TIME TO STINK? Add a breath of fresh air anywhere!

      http://www.otsfresh.com/

  • Virtual Aroma
    More smell in a box. -- barb
    http://www.virtualaroma.com/va_nosound.html
  • Washington Post
    "Pesticide Coalition Tries to Blunt Regulation"
    By George Lardner Jr. and Joby Warrick
    Washington Post Staff Writers
    Saturday, May 13, 2000; Page A01
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A59369-2000May12.html

    Priter Friendly version http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A59369-2000May12?language=printer






  • There are "Experts" and then there are EXPERTS

    Remember the "experts" scoffed at TB, MS, . . . asthma. Naturally they are going to scoff at MCS . . . and denigrate the harbingers. I'd love to see some psychological profiles on the "Experts"!

    And we all know how the "Experts" love to shove stats in our faces for MCS being, in their mind, a woman's disease, well, what say they about MS stats? "MS is 2-3 times as common in women than in men." (Source: The National Multiple Sclerosis Society http://www.nationalmssociety.org/\Sourcebook-Epidemiology.asp

    By the bye, breast cancer is also more common in women, but I wonder if we'll see an increase in breast cancer with men wearing and using more scented products. I also wonder if that query is on anyone's radar screen?

    One of my favorite pieces is The Guy in the Glass -- I believe it should be required study for all who are interested in keeping truth from the public, as well as those who perpetrate the "Hateful-Hurtfuls." We are affected by them whether its in our homes and neighborhoods, workplaces, schools, healthcare facilities, places of worship, the media, . . .

    The Guy In the Glass
    by Dale Wimbrow, (c) 1934
    http://users.lmi.net/wilworks/ehnlinx/manglass.htm

    EXPERTS
    To read helpful and useful information to help you gain access and accommodation, please visit EHN's Take Heart! -- barb


    REMEMBER: Write Now!

    Go to Act Now! http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnhompg/action.htm

    Move on to Take Heart!
    http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnhompg/takheart.htm

    Then take a moment. Write Now!
    http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnhompg/action.htm#Write Now!

    Visit EHN's home page
    http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnindex.htm


    Reach us by e-mail

    wilworks@lmi.net


    For general EHN contact information please visit: http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnhompg/contact.htm

    If you have contributions for The New Reactor, please e-mail to wilworks@lmi.net and put "NR" in the subject line.

    Top of page



    As with all organizations, EHN depends upon your contributions of time and energy, as well as your monetary membership support. For your conveninece, a mail-in membership/donation form is available at http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnmemor.htm.

    The URL for this page is http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnhompg/stufhaps.htm

    Comments? wilworks@lmi.net. Please put WWW in subject line. Thanks.


    1/25/2000

    Top of page

    Return to EHN's homepage (http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnindex.htm)

    The Environmental Health Network (EHN) [of California] is a 501 (c) (3) non profit agency and offers support and information for the chemically injured. Learn from the work of Julia Kendall, get The BEST of the Reactor, join EHN and receive The New Reactor, the guy in the glass,. See what influence the Chemical Manufacturers have had against those of us with EI. The URL for this page is http://users.lmi.net/~wilworks/ehnindex.htm